format proportions
So there are three design systems operating in an image at the same time: (1) the pattern of physical objects within a projective geometry that simulates the appearance of a three dimensional world, taught as linear perspective; (2) the pattern of shapes, tones and colors in relation to each other on a two dimensional surface, usually taught as principles of composition and design; and (3) the distribution of all image elements within the format proportions, the space defined by the image boundaries.
Across a long pictorial tradition, the picture plane was thought of as a window opening onto a three dimensional picture space. Linear perspective dictated the size and shape of objects in this space, but left to the painter the problem of presenting them to view, much as a director arranges the actors and props on a stage. These "problems of staging and set design" were governed by principles of composition, primarily to make the painting legible, pleasing and impactful.
This emphasis on perspective and composition demoted the format edges to peripheral vision and, until the early 20th century, paintings were almost always framed (often ostentatiously) in order to visually separate the image limits from the image itself. These conventions transformed the format into an illusory, arbitrary restriction, as if removing the frame would reveal an expansive, unedited view of the picture space.
In contrast, the 20th century esthetics of nonrepresentational and pop painting have made explicit expressive use of the size and shape of the image itself. Everything imagined to create the image is available to view on its surface; the limits of the painting are integral to its overall legibility and impact, and there is usually no implied representation outside the format. These paintings are typically displayed unframed or, in paintings by Paul Gauguin, John Marin, Howard Hodgkin and many others, are actually painted onto the frame, which becomes part of the work.
To govern these new styles, painters did a peculiar thing: they attempted to justify in abstract or "scientific" terms the compositional principles developed in the representational (perspective) tradition. This process of abstraction took off in the 19th century, for example in the writings of John Ruskin or Auguste Laugel, and it flowered into a largely arbitrary system of "design principles" that is still taught to art students today. These dogmas disregard format based rules of design, although format principles seem clearly implied by contemporary painting assumptions.
As a corrective to this oversight I have tried to understand how the different format dimensions create lines of proportional stress or emphasis on the picture plane. In this page, I describe a proportional system based on half folds or squares of the format dimensions, and suggest some design principles based on them.
These format proportions apply to rectangular formats with proportions between 1:1 and 2:1 (height:width or width:height). This includes the majority of artworks etchings, prints, paintings, frescos since the Renaissance, and all popular watercolor paper formats. I believe other formats circular, oval, scroll, standing figure portrait can be controlled with similar proportional schemes by enclosing the format within a rectangle or square, though I don't pursue that idea here.
In my experience these format proportions produce balanced, satisfying but sometimes static images; compositions judged with them are often very good, and never "bad". They provide a reliable frame of reference simple, explicit, objective within which the perspective and formal composition of a painting can be critiqued. They are apparently an intuitive solution to composition problems, as paintings that rely on the format proportions can be found in any survey of Western paintings from the 15th to 20th centuries.
Analyzing a painting in terms of the format proportions puts both representation and "composition" on an equal footing, and is surprisingly useful to uncover basic design decisions. In fact, editing an "unruly" painting to improve its format proportions often clarifies the effects created by disregarding the proportional divisions.
Note added in 2005: Several years after this page was written, a reader alerted me to Charles Bouleau's Frameworks: The Secret Geometry of Painters (1963), which analyzes paintings in terms of "the armature of the rectangle" and describes a method of rabattement des petits côtés that I present as the square divisions and quarter folds of the rectangle. However, I was disappointed to find that Bouleau's authority is no better than mine: across more than 100 paintings, he merely inserts the ad hoc "framework" that seems convincing to him in each case, without any historical testimony or xray evidence to confirm the constructions were actually used by the painters. So despite Bouleau's priority, this page remains my independent and equally undocumented contribution to the problem of design within rectangular formats. In rectangular paintings with an aspect ratio (the ratio of height : width) between 2:1 (a "portrait" rectangle) and 1:2 (a "landscape" rectangle), the obvious format proportions are the dominant half folds of the height or width, which divide the picture plane into quarters and locate the format center; and the weaker quarter folds that divide the sheet into sixteenths. (These "folds" are imaginary; you don't actually crease the paper.) folds in the format I've also shown, as an orange box, the outermost eighth folds (cc and mm), which are halfway between c or m and the nearest edge of the sheet. These establish an implicit frame or picture boundary inside the image; as I explain later, strong forms in the image usually should not extend beyond this frame, unless the forms are cropped by the image boundaries, or are used to symbolize flow or dynamic movement. The compositional importance of these divisions is roughly C > M > c > m. For example, it is visually more distracting if a vertical edge (the side of a building) coincides with C across most of the height of the picture, than it is when a horizontal edge (the horizon) coincides with M across most of the width of the picture; this implies M is a weaker division. The second system of format proportions is based on squares constructed from the smaller format dimension (the height of the sheet in landscape orientation) and from the half dimensions created by the centerline and midline folds. squares in the format |
|
||||||||
| In general, the visual emphasis carried by these divisions is h' >> c' > m'.
The width of the image is larger than its height, so a square based on the larger format dimension falls outside the image. However, when hanging the painting, this square can determine the minimum distance to leave between the painting and objects above or below it (or, in portrait orientation, objects on either side). use the square of the longer side to separate a picture from objects around it Construction by Measurement. If you are drawing or painting freehand, in the field or studio, you may want to mark the format proportions on the support before you begin work on the drawing or underdrawing. The most accurate way to do this is with a ruler or tape measure, as follows: 1. Measure the long and short dimensions of the sheet. 2. Divide these two dimensions by 4. 3. Locate the centerline, midline and quarter folds from these divisions. Measure on four sides of the sheet and connect to create six lines. 4. Mark the shorter dimension of the sheet along the longer edge to locate the square h'. 5. Mark the centerline and midline dimensions, along the edges parallel to each fold, to define the squares m' and c'. There is a simple trick to marking the folds without doing any complex division. Just find the length on a ruler, yardstick or tape measure that is slightly larger than the height (width) of the sheet and is easily divisible by four. (On a 22" x 30" full sheet, those lengths are 24" and 32".) To divide the sheet, angle the ruler or tape measure across the sheet so that one edge of the paper is at zero inches and the other edge is at 24" (or whatever number divisible by four you have chosen). Then mark off the quarter intervals (for 24" inches, these would be 6", 12" and 18"). If this is unclear, see this explanation. Draw lines through these quarter divisions parallel to the edges of the sheet. Now you can measure H, C and M directly, then locate these distances from the appropriate edges to define h', c' and m'. Constructing With a Measure Bar. If you repeatedly use a specific format the full sheet, or a 9" x 12" watercolor block, or a 6' length from a 48" wide watercolor roll it is most efficient to mark all the format proportions on a single strip of cardboard or wood molding, and use this measure bar to transfer the proportions to each new sheet. You can also draw the outline of the format on your working surface or drawing board, mark the format divisions around the outside edge, then transfer these to the sheet by placing it inside the outline. Constructing With "Compass" and Straight Edge. Classical methods avoid working with numbers. In this approach, you use a long piece of string tied around the tip of a pencil, or a cardboard strip fixed at one end with a push pin, as both compass and ruler. marking format proportions with string and pencil 2. With your right hand, bring the pencil across and down the sheet toward the bottom edge, keeping the string taut. As you do, lightly draw a short arc at three places: around the approximate centerline of the sheet, around the approximate midline of the sheet, and at the top edge (blue marks in the diagram). 3. Repeat this procedure three more times, fixing the string at each of the remaining three corners, and keeping the string the same length. This will produce matching edge marks at the top and bottom of the sheet, and four "x" marks within the sheet where two arcs cross at the midline or centerline. 4. Lay the string across the paper between matching edge marks at the top and bottom of the sheet, and make a freehand vertical line on the sheet using the string as a drawing guide: this defines the square division h'. C is defined by a vertical line through the two arc "x"'s on the centerline; and M is indicated by a horizontal line through the two arc "x"'s at the midline, as shown above. 5. To find the quarter divisions, stretch the string with one end at the lower left corner (4) and the other end at the top edge location for C, as shown above. The point where this string crosses M is the location of the lefthand quarter fold (c). Keep the string fixed at the lower left corner, and stretch the other end to the right edge location for M; the point where this string crosses C is the location of the lower m. Repeat from the upper righthand corner (2) to locate the upper m and righthand c. Lightly indicate the lines through these four points parallel to the edges of the sheet. 6. Again fixing the string at each corner, place the pencil on the midline M, then swing this distance up or down to the top or bottom edge; these marks define m' on both sides. Connect with two vertical lines. 7. Finally, fixing the string at each corner, take the distance to the centerline down to the side edges; these marks define c' on both sides. Connect with two horizontal lines. Rabattement des petits côtés. For smaller sheets or for construction without using a string compass, the method described by Charles Bouleau as rabattement des petits côtés ("folding down of the smaller sides") is easier. To do this: 1. Measure and mark the length of the shorter sides of the rectangle along the longer sides, from the corners at both ends, and connect the marks to define the divisions h'. 2. Construct the two diagonals inside each of the squares formed by h'. 3. These diagonals will form a small diamond or rotated square in the center of the format. A vertical line through the top and bottom corners of this square defines C; a horizontal line through the left and right corners of this square defines M; horizontal lines through the top or bottom corners define the two m' divisions; vertical lines through the two side corners define the two c' divisions. 4. Using diagonal lines, as described in step 5 of the previous method, construct the quarter folds on all four sides. Bouleau's method of rabattement in the format Computer Format Templates. You must first determine the file image size (pixel height by pixel width) appropriate for your working methods. This means you have format templates for: 1. each of the paper formats you use most often, 2. sized to accommodate the projection or copying method(s) you use to transfer the image outlines to the paper. The first issue arises because different brands of paper define the standard formats differently (the double elephant in Arches is not the same as the double elephant in Saunders Waterford, for example); some brands (Zerkall) use nonstandard dimensions; and all handmade sheets can be quirky. The second issue arises because optical projection systems have different focal lengths or enlargement ratios. If you want to project an image onto a full sheet paper, for example, then the image you are projecting should be large enough to produce a large, bright image for copying, but not be so large that it cannot be brought into focus within the format area. The following images show the format proportion templates for two common watercolor paper formats and the classic golden rectangle. These also illustrate what happens to the format proportions as the rectangle becomes more elongated. (For comparison, the horizontal and vertical divisions by thirds are shown as small blue dots.)
composition proportions in some common formats Computer Image Editing. Once the format proportions have been constructed or templated, then fitting the image into the format and aligning the image elements with the format proportions is a matter of experience, artistic style and the specifics of the image. Here I describe the procedure I use to edit the composition of a digital photograph, though the logic of the method applies as well to composing the image by eye in a freehand drawing or through a camera viewfinder. First do any major image editing in the full size image before working with format proportions. For example, in landscape photos, I typically correct for foreground expansion caused by the camera optics, so I do this before adjusting to format proportions. I may also delete or reposition (cut and paste) objects in the photo to improve the image composition and legibility before using the format proportions, or to bring everything into better aligment with the folds and squares when the format proportions are added. Here, step by step, are the menu and keystroke commands for Adobe Photoshop in the Mac OS: 1. Open as separate files the art image and the format template for the support you intend to use for the painting or drawing. 2. In the format template file, Select All (Command+A) and Copy (Command+C) the format template. Close this file. 3. Switch to the digital image file and Paste (Command+V) the template as a new layer on top of the digital image. 4. In the Layers window, set the transparency of the format template to 50%. (If you do not see the Layers window already open with your files, it is found in the Windows > Layers pulldown menu.) 5. In the Layers window, click on the digital image layer. Then Select All (Command+A) and choose the Free Transform function (Command+T). The image will be outlined by an animated dashed box, with small squares at each corner and the center of each side. Note that I resize the photo rather than the template, because the template has been presized to accommodate my printing and projection tools.
editing a photograph with a format proportion template At this point your working image will appear similar to the upper image above. You will see the digital image and, floating in front of it, the semitransparent format template. 6. Hold down your shift key and option keys (Shift+Option) at the same time, then click on and hold a corner box of the image with your mouse cursor. Move this corner toward or away from the center of the image to resize the image. Release the shift and option keys, then click and hold anywhere inside the image to grab the image to move it up, down, left or right. (You can also use your keyboard arrows to make these repositioning adjustments.) Continue resizing and/or repositioning the image until you get the image proportions you want within the format outline. 7. Double click inside the image to resize it. The Free Transform guides will disappear. 8. Using the Layers window, click on the template layer. 9. Using the magic wand tool, click on the area outside the template. Then Select Inverse (Shift+Command+I) to select the template itself. 10. Crop the image (from the pulldown Image > Crop menu). Your file will now look like the bottom image, above. 11. In the Layers window, grab the template layer and drag it to the layer trash can. The template disappears. 12. Mark the corners of the image with black dots if they will not be easily visible when the image is projected, so that the image can be correctly sized, focused and registered over the support for tracing. Note that the resizing and repositioning may produce an empty border along one side of the image (as you see along the lefthand edge in the example above). This area is usually small enough so that it can be completed freehand during the process of tracing or painting. If it is much larger, you can use the image editing program to fill the area by copying and pasting elements of the image. Format Design Principles. Step 6, the actual resizing and repositioning, is a subjective and exploratory process. It is important to play around with the image, trying different sizes and different positionings of a new size, before you find a solution that "clicks" (and you double click on it). I sometimes just observe the effects of resizing until I notice a solution that seems to work, then I reposition and resize to the template guidelines. If the result does not seem satisfying, I return to the original image size (Control+Z) to find another one. Often, the size of the major form dictates the approximate enlargement required, and it's just a matter of moving the resized image around to position it against the template guidelines. A reliable method is to start with the most dominant image element(s), and work from those to the less important image elements. In the example image, the cat, bookshelf and window created an obvious vertical point of interest, so first I positioned the image so that these fell against the righthand h' and c divisions. Then I resized the image to find a good placement against the lefthand h' and c, and finally moved the resized image up or down to find a good placement against the horizontal guidelines. Here are some suggested formatting principles, with reference to the demonstration photograph (lower image, above): Do not center important large forms. Avoid centering any dominant object, either around the midpoint of the format or on the centerline or midline. The major exception is when the object is isolated in the image and is the sole focus of attention (for example, the animal skull in the O'Keeffe painting below, or any portrait by Chuck Close). In the example image, no object is centered. Do not place strong edges along the centerline or midline. For example, in a landscape, do not place the horizon or rooftops along the midline, or the edge of a building along the centerline. In the example, there is no strong edge along the centerline or midline. Emphasize the edges or dimensions of important large forms, or the center of important small forms, by placing them on or next to the format folds or squares (other than C and M). The goal is to place the dominant forms and edges in the image so that they seem to fit into or hang from the format guidelines. How you approach this depends on your choice of important or interesting forms and their spatial relationships within the image. During digital editing you can resize the image so that the dominant objects correspond to the template guidelines, and use cut and paste or drawing tools to move or edit less important objects or edges into better alignment. For partial balance, place two important but contrasting forms along the two strong vertical lines (h' and c) or (h' and m'). In the example, these are the front left corner of the table, the paintings propped on the table top, and the nearby front right corner of the cardboard box (on the lefthand h' and c), and the edge of the bookshelf, window and the inquisitive cat (on the righthand h' and c). For asymmetry, place a single important form or strong edge along only one strong vertical line (h' and c) or (h' and m'). In the example, the bookshelf and cat at the righthand h' and c, and the illumination flowing into the frame from the window, provide stronger visual interest and greater emphasis than the corner and leg of the table at left. All the forms are arrayed in relation to the compact, bright window puncturing the shadowed wall, and the large, diffuse area of illuminated wall and floor. Place the center of attention off center but inside the central rectangle. The central rectangle is defined by the dominant vertical lines h' or c on either side and by c' and/or m above and below. Note that these lines may be close together (as are h' and c in the image above) or may be separated (c' and m in the image above), which I feel defines gradations in emphasis that are unique to each format. The central rectangle is typically the place in the composition where the principal subjects (including strong contrasts of value, color, texture or visual detail) are located. In the full sheet format (used in the example above), this area is large and well structured, allowing for an expansive visual interest including the cat, the bookshelf, the chair and the table. Notice that the same image could be resized and cropped in many other ways to emphasize the cat, the table, the cat and the window, and so on. As is, the image implies a broad view of the whole room. (The photo was taken as my wife and I were unpacking in our retirement home, and for me evokes a moment of nostalgia, which is not a detail state of mind.) Enclose at least one visually interesting or important form inside one of the keystone rectangles. These rectangles are usually the smallest inner rectangles formed by the format divisions, but they can be the central rectangle (defined above) divided by M and C. These keystone rectangles often include a local center of interest in the painting but do not have to do so (as we'll see in a painting by Caravaggio). In the example, the back of the wooden chair, with its pattern of closely spaced vertical posts, provides visual interest to balance the cat, window and table. If perspective or spatial depth is implied, space distance markers along the format lines. In landscape the horizontal lines are especially important. Do not link the horizontal and vertical lines in nested rectangles toward the center unless you want to create a tunneling effect. In the example, the nearest table leg falls on the lower eighth fold (mm), the far front leg and the hind feet of the cat on the lower m, the seat of the chair and far table leg on c', the corner of the table top on M, the window frame and top of propped paintings approximately on the upper c', and the top of the lamp and bookshelf on the upper mm. Do not extend or place important static forms outside the "frame" of eighth folds (cc and mm) unless the forms are cropped by the image borders. This is not a hard and fast rule, though it usually contributes to a good result. In the example, the tops of the torchere lamp and rowboat bookshelf lie on the top eighth fold; the corner of the table and cardboard box lie on the lefthand eighth fold; the leg of the table and bottom of the box lie along the bottom edge fold. The window extends outside the righthand eighth fold, but it (actually, the molding around it) is cropped by the image boundary. Although the window placement up against the format corner was an unanticipated result of the resizing, I decided it worked in context to "hang" the window around the cone of light entering the room. And this suggests a final principle: Place important forms outside the "frame" of eighth folds (cc and mm) to create a sense of dynamic movement across the image or open space beyond it. In the example, the window symbolizes the flow of light into the room and the presence of a landscape beyond its confines. In other situations a strong form of that shape in that location would probably look wrong, and this would need to be addressed by editing (deleting or moving) the offending object into a better position. The most common approach is the intuitive arrangement of major forms or shapes in the image. The criterion here is just "a good effect" for the specific image, without relying on general principles. In the simplest approach, the most interesting part of the image is located on a sweet spot a point displaced to one side and above or below the center of the image and then the image is resized or cropped to fill the rest of the format in a pleasing way. Another approach is the mise en scène strategy of stage managing the forms within the image to emphasize dramatic relationships, tell a story, highlight main characters or character contrasts, and so forth. A delightful example is Weegee's The Critic, in itself a carefully staged "class encounter" that was cropped in two versions to emphasize the character contrast between attenuated socialites and a drunken street character. There is nothing wrong with either approach; in fact, by playing around with the resizing and positioning of any image within a format template, you are simply using "what works" or "what looks good" to find an effective solution. But even with the two intuitive methods, the format proportions operate in the background, as can be used a reference and to critique specific ways in which the composition does or does not work.
A third compositional strategy is a geometrical arrangement of dominant forms. It is common in art history to hear a painting analyzed into a simplified geometrical framework, such as the golden rectangle, the square, two or more overlapping circles, the main diagonals, a triangle or pyramid, nested triangles or pyramids, and so on. I have never had sympathy for this brutish and simpleminded analysis and, excepting the analysis of paintings from the Italian Renaissance, don't see much relevance in it. |
||||||||||
|
In his book, Bouleau contrived many complex variations on the square divisions, including the use of harmonic intervals across the format dimensions proportions that match the whole number fractions of musical intervals: 1/2 (the musical octave), 2/3 (the fifth), 3/4 (the fourth), 4/5 (the third), supplemented by diagonals drawn from the major divisions. I find the result (diagram right) to be so cluttered as to be useless.
My dissent from this approach is that it creates formalisms that have little relevance to the way we look at the world or at art. In particular, most of the geometric formalisms really define solutions to composition and design, not to the specific problem of fitting the image within a format.
Our visual experience is not aimless, ad hoc or mathematically prissy: it is consistently skilled, motivated and pragmatic. It's my claim that the format proportions represent a form of visual field, and the structure of the visual field represents the structure of our interests and aims in relation to the world. We identify the most important features of our world within our continuous stream of experience, then apportion or balance our looking among these features in a way that reflects how we believe they relate to each other and to our immediate priorities of enjoyment, understanding or action. We also commonly do this from a distance that allows us to see the important forms within a situating context. |
![]() diagonal (quarter) divisions of Bouleau's "armature du rectangle" |
|||||||||
| I believe the whole point of compositional systems based on the rectangle format is that they shape our attention dividing visual strategies. Looking directly at something emphasizes its importance. Dividing attention often means we balance our looking across competing things available to view, which tends to center them in a wider view. Disregarding or discounting means we push things into our peripheral vision. This is basically what the format proportions do they divide up the support into competing areas of unequal interest. A simple interpretation is that the h' squares represent the overlapping retinal areas of a binocular field of view, the outer eighth folds the widest area of view, and the central rectangles the focus of attention (at right, in the full sheet format). This dictates that more elongated formats are appropriate for forms viewed from a distance or as a series or progression, while squarish formats are appropriate for forms viewed as exemplars or individuals, separate from context and movement.
The compositional guides are not an empty or arbitrary geometry. They suggest how the viewer should look within the image, as he or she were actually inside the world of the painting or photograph. They do this because they mimic our habitual strategies of visual attention. By placing the important parts of the image along or inside strong divisions and keystone rectangles, the artist implicitly directs the viewer's selective exploration and appreciation of the total information in the image. This is why format based composition turns up in photographs or images even cinematic or advertising images that were created by artists who may have rejected the classical formalisms of composition and design. Why not just divide the format by thirds (the musical interval of a fifth) and be done with it? As you can see in the format templates above, formats with an aspect ratio around 1:1.5 (the half sheet or emperor) place the h' and m' vertical divisions at the vertical 1/3 divisions. But in many compositions based on the thirds, the central rectangle is crowded into too small an area in the middle of the sheet, so that the focus of attention is, as it were, viewed from too far away. In most formats, two of three vertical divisions c, m' or h' and both horizontal proportions (m and c') are closer to the edge than the divisions by thirds. Placing compositional elements on these outer divisions seems more pleasing. The major exception is the square format or formats that are nearly square. In a square the square division h' disappears, c' = M and m' = C, and the sheet is defined entirely by the half folds. In that case the division by thirds can supplement the half fold divisions.
composition proportions in a near square format The illustration (a CD cover for the album Animals by Pink Floyd) illustrates use of the third and half fold proportions in a nearly square (1:1.15) format. I offer this as an especially convincing example because the flying pig is placed exactly at the point where the upper and left third divisions cross. But nearly all the format lines are aligned with or centered on some important architectural edge or form. The monumental impression created by the factory portrait is emphasized by its harmonious, stable placement within the image dimensions.
I have done this with a large number of published paintings over the years, and have been impressed by how consistently the format proportions anchor important image elements in paintings by a wide variety of artists in a wide range of styles. I suggest you test this for yourself: leaf through any art historical book or photographic magazine, or freeze frames from your favorite wide screen film, and pick out images that seem to be effectively or badly composed. Then use the image outline to construct the format proportions in the image, and see whether the pleasing composition can be explained by the guidelines. |
![]() the format proportions as |
|||||||||
| In this section I offer analysis of 15 paintings from the western canon, both to show how they respect the format divisions (whether intended or not by the artist), and to illustrate how departures from the formatting principles are interesting for the effects or insights they can reveal.
In all images, white or gray lines are used to show the six format half and quarter folds (C, M, c, m), red lines the six square folds (h', c' and m'), and orange the eighth fold frame (mm and cc). The square folds h' and c' (w' and m' in portrait format) are shown as bold lines.
Two cautions are necessary when doing this. First, paintings may have been trimmed during relining, stretching or restoration, or arbitrarily cropped to fit page formats in books, and these proportions will give a distorted idea of the format proportions of the original work. Second, paintings are rich with detail, which means only large or important forms should be interpreted.
format proportions in a painting by Pollaiuolo (1.43:1)
format proportions in a painting by Botticelli (1:1.61)
format proportions in a painting by Titian (1:1.40)
format proportions in a painting by Caravaggio (1:1.36) format proportions in a painting by Poussin (1:1.39)
format proportions in a painting by Vermeer (1.19:1) format proportions in a painting by Velázquez (1:1.46)
format proportions in a painting by David (1:1.28)
format proportions in a painting by Manet (1:1.26) format proportions in a painting by Degas (1:1.48) format proportions in a painting by Renoir (1:1.34) format proportions in a painting by Signac (1:1.44) format proportions in a painting by J.S. Sargent (1.29:1)
format proportions in a painting by O'Keeffe (1.22:1) format proportions in a painting by Hopper (1:1.43) That's a fair challenge, and a fair test is to find a composition that does not seem to correspond to the format proportions in an obvious way, then change the major elements to coincide with those proportions and see what effect this has on the image. To illustrate the basic procedure, I will use a painting by Edward Hopper: Portland Head Light (1923).
a painting altered to accent the format proportions To accent these proportions, the center of the lighthouse was shifted left to fall on the closely spaced h'/m' lines. The base of the tower and small house were dropped to the lower m/c' lines, and the top catwalk in the light tower was moved down to the upper m/c' lines. The small house was moved inward between c and m', and the main house was shifted slightly to bring the join between large and small parts of the house to h' and the porch to cc along the right edge of the picture (third image). The bottom image shows this altered painting with the proportion lines removed. To me, the revised composition has a less dramatic and compact effect than the original, but it has a greater feeling of openness and visual stability. There is a distinct tension between the tower and house, and a more interesting rhythm connecting the buildings with the rocky beach. The weight of the horizon is greater, partly because the height of the tower has been reduced and the ocean's area within the central rectangle has been increased. (In my experience, emphasizing the format proportions often creates a stronger sense of recession and a greater feeling of space.)
I chose this example partly because the original seems to have been painted (or sketched for painting) in a open field. The altered image would closely correspond to the view that Hopper could have taken by standing about 50 feet to his left. Although the site today has been heavily landscaped and fenced, there is a sea cliff and steep walkway at that location which would have made an inconvenient perch even in Hopper's time. Therefore his design was at least in part dictated by site specific obstacles, yet the format analysis still identifies the resulting compromises in his painting.
the Pollaiuolo painting altered to improve format proportions
By making the archers correspond closely to the format divisions, Pollaiuolo invested the displacement of the saint's body from these divisions with greater expressive significance: the misalignment symbolizes the agony. More generally, the effect of using the format proportions consistently throughout a design is to produce a more balanced and integrated image, which can also cause the picture to seem static or tidy. For some painting goals this will not be desirable!
the Manet painting altered to improve format proportions The composition has become more balanced and stable, and in the process more domesticated. The grouping of figures is tightened in a way that seals them off from the uncanny woods around them, there is more light and bourgeois interest in keeping food nearby. One misses the unsettling effect in the original of the strong tilt of the figures and lawn downward to the left, which doesn't consciously register until it has been removed. The revised version makes it seem as if ladies go naked in the park because men are docile and the lawn free of insects. The insouciance of the avant garde has been lost. the arbitrary effect of explaining a composition with too many lines A more sophisticated explanation has been developed by Robert DiCurcio as the Grail Geometry in Vermeer's images. I can't do justice to his ideas here, but the pictorial analyses that result are substantially more elegant than Boileau's; the flavor can be conveyed in DiCurcio's anchoring of a hexagram in the image geometry (image below). a symbolic geometry derived from image elements How does my modest system of format proportions fare? The illustration (below) indicates several points of convergence, though there is no guarantee the image dimensions match the original either as it was framed by Vermeer, or as it exists today after centuries of curatorial trimming and relining.
the format proportions |
||||||||||
| However, it seems to me the assumption that the painter in the image is actually Vermeer raises an obvious question: what kind of compositional framework is the painter using? Vermeer shows enough of his painter's work for us to impose his canvas formats onto the image (green rectangle). And from this we can construct the format proportions of the painter's composition (image, right).
Not only do my format proportions locate several significant features of the female image her eyes, wrists, hat, book corners, etc. within the painter's painting, the major horizontal divisions h' and M correspond closely with the horizontal divisions c' and M of Vermeer's painting! But the lesson here precludes gloating: there are many ways to skin a canvas. Artists should develop and use their own system, relying on whatever works. My approach has been to choose the proportional constructions in advance, apply them consistently to historical examples or my own works, and from this study develop principles that describe the effects that result when a design adheres to or ignores the format proportions. This minimizes the arbitrariness of the activity and increases my understanding of design decisions. In that spirit, I urge you to browse any book of art reproductions, choose paintings that seem especially well composed or satisfying to you, then establish the format proportions in the image to see how well these correspond to significant guidelines. Try them in your own paintings, too. Last revised 11.12.2007 © 2007 Bruce MacEvoy |
![]() the format proportions in the painter's painting |
|||||||||