![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
First, the historical context. The conservative Royal Academy and the two watercolor societies maintained control of the top tiers of the art hierarchy, but dissenting or regional groups continued to form as watercolors reached the zenith of their institutional and amateur popularity. The groundbreaking Norwich Society of Artists, founded in 1803 and active until the 1830's, was the strongest group of artists working outside London. Toward the end of the Victorian era, many regional art exhibitions in Liverpool, Newcastle, Birmingham, Leeds and Bristol flourished on the popularity of amateur watercolor painting. In London, the Dudley Gallery (active from 1865 to 1882) provided unjuried exhibition space to watercolor artists excluded from the established watercolor societies, thereby sustaining market interest in the painting talents of unconventional professionals and accomplished amateurs alike. And of amateurs there was no dearth: this was the peak of watercolor popularity, when everyone from common schoolchildren to the Royal couple Queen Victoria and Prince Albert was out painting the English countryside. The Dudley Gallery exhibitions were known for their display of paintings that went against the academic grain a wealth of genre paintings, and in particular the freely executed style known as the watercolor sketch. The conservative emphasis on "finish" in exhibition watercolors had created a popular appreciation for the watercolor sketch, which was seen as a more sincere, more lyrical, and more infectiously spontaneous type of art. It also put the unique strengths of the watercolor medium on best display, and allowed the artist to exploit "rough" visual effects (a partially visible graphite or charcoal underdrawing, rapid and expressive brushwork, blossoms and other watermarks, drybrush textures, and colors mixed on the page). The sketch came to stand for romantic sentiment, an opposition to academic or institutional standards of art, and the artistic goal of observing nature directly to capture natural phenomena more accurately an increasingly explicit 19th century painting practice in contrast to the idealized conventions of the 18th century. In retaliation, the established societies began in 1843 to hold separate winter exhibits for the display of watercolor sketches, but with mixed results: most artists exhibited "sketches" that were obviously as carefully contrived as their finished works. As late as 1884, the American painter James McNeil Whistler could still be derided by a critic for displaying watercolors that seemed "little more than hints and memoranda." For in this period English painters finally succeeded in making watercolors the visual equal of oil painting. They achieved this in part by expanding the format of watercolors (sometimes to three or more feet wide, thanks to custom watercolor papers made by James Whatman) and by hanging the paintings in ornate gilt frames. Prices increased with size, too, which provided many artists with a comfortable or even lucrative professional income and the incentive to invest more labor in watercolor painting. But the crucial technical innovation was the development of a proprietary, extremely fine zinc white, manufactured expressly for watercolors under the name Chinese white by Winsor & Newton in 1834. Artists used this new paint as a highly reflective foundation color applied directly to the paper, as a slightly "clouding" pigment to lend a hazy appearance to washes (a technique originated by J.M.W. Turner), and as an opacifying additive that transformed standard watercolor pigments into gouache or bodycolor. (Unmodified or "transparent" watercolors could still be used for glazing or for contrasting color effects.) When finished off with a thick coating of gum varnish, these paintings achieved a brilliance of color and an evenness of surface that in some cases was indistinguishable from oil paintings. Gouache also let painters apply the paint with the same patient accumulation of brushstrokes as they used in oils, making the works appear more substantial and finely wrought. From the very first, many artists disputed the "legitimacy" of bodycolor techniques, claiming opaque color "violated" the spirit of transparent watercolor (in Victorian times, "violate" meant "rape") and remarkably, some 21st century watercolor artists still echo these polemical myths. But art consumers voted with their pocketbooks, and for several decades bodycolor carried the day. Guiding public taste through these conflicting artistic trends was a new type of journalistic art critic, including many former or practicing painters, such as the nationalistic William Henry Pyne (1769-1845, writing after 1820 under the name Ephraim Hardcastle) and the magisterial and brilliant John Ruskin who literally taught the Victorians which paintings to admire, and why. Underneath the surface of the critical reviews of the time were several cultural preoccupations: the importance of status or "dead" tradition (the societies) in contrast to "living" innovation (the Dudley and Grosvenor galleries); "masculine" styles (David Cox) vs. "feminine" or sentimental styles (Birket Foster); the schools of photographic "detail" (Price Boyce) and poetic "effect" (Samuel Palmer); finish vs. sketch; and bodycolor vs. transparent color. These labelmongering and trivial debates were an inevitable outgrowth of institutional status struggles, artistic careerism and consumer uncertainty. But the reviews in Victorian periodicals such as Art Journal had a significant effect on consumer tastes and purchase decisions, so all these debates affected the artists' bottom line. The stakes got pretty high: art collectors paid significantly increased prices for paintings by Turner, David Cox, Peter DeWint and other respected masters of the recent past, especially after 1850, and many galleries and art speculators profited from the ever increasing demand for contemporary artworks during the continuous prosperity of Victorian England. Novel watercolor effects became popular more intense and prismatic colors in particular, thanks to the new dyes created by 19th century industrial chemistry. Market pressures in turn stimulated ambitious artists to adopt these untested, brighter but fugitive pigments or to use radically experimental painting methods (John Sell Cotman made many late paintings with an unreliable medium of starch paste). This cycle of increasingly unrealistic prices paid for kitschier paintings executed with more fugitive or untested materials and the decisive tilt toward oils by innovative French painters and traditional French art academies culminated after 1890 in a collapse of confidence in watercolors as investment art. Watercolors have never really recovered the artistic capital lost in that catastrophe. |
|
||||||
>But at midcentury watercolors were near the peak of their popularity, and John Frederick Lewis (1805-1876) was among the artists at the top. Son of a London engraver, he began as a wildlife portraitist in oils, but switched to watercolors and was elected to the Old Water-Colour Society (OWCS) in 1827. He made long trips through the Continent (first to Venice, then to Spain), contributing to the flood of travel publications with his Lewis's Sketches and Drawings of the Alhambra (1835) and a sequel work. He travelled abroad again in 1837, settling in Cairo in 1841 where he stayed for 10 years perfecting a meticulous bodycolor technique. |
|||||||
![]() | |||||||
Miles Birket Foster (1825-1899) came to watercolors in his late 20's and produced amazingly detailed sentimental landscapes until the end of his life. He was raised in London and apprenticed to a wood engraver. During the 1840's he worked as an illustrator for periodicals such as Punch and the Illustrated London News, but after a tour of the Rhineland in 1852-53 he taught himself to paint in watercolors and launched a hugely popular painting career. He was elected to the OWCS in 1860, and contributed over 400 paintings to exhibitions there and at the Royal Academy. From the first he was one of the society's most popular artists; along with William Henry Hunt, he epitomizes the meticulous and sentimental realism of the Victorian era. |
|||||||
Another illustrator turned watercolorist, Frederick Walker (1840-1875) was the son of a Marylebone jeweller who encouraged his son's art career. Walker worked briefly for an architect, taught himself the principles of classical design among the antiquities at the British Museum, then entered the Royal Academy schools in 1858. He trained for three years under the wood engraver Josiah Whymper (1813-1903), and after 1860 was a much sought after illustrator of books and periodicals under the tutelage of William Thackeray. He exhibited his first oils at the Royal Academy in 1863 and joined the OWCS in 1864. His paintings of apparently simple but overly sentimental rural and rustic life, utilizing the painting techniques of William Henry Hunt and Birket Foster, were enormously popular and influenced many imitators. Birket Foster and Walker were among the descriptively precise, illustrator artists most enthusiastically endorsed by the watercolor societies and most congenial to collectors, conservative art critics, and the Germanic tastes of stodgy Prince Albert, consort to Queen Victoria. This style emphasized the "honest-to-God workmanship" of painstaking drawing and tedious brushwork combined with heightened color and a heavy gilt frame that were so much valued in the Victorian watercolor. But several talented artists adopted or cautiously innovated within the traditions of Late Georgian painters. For many of these, the poetical "effect" found in paintings by David Cox or J.M.W. Turner was the primary source of inspiration. |
|||||||
Thomas Collier (1840-1891) was the son of a prosperous tradesman; he attended the Manchester School of Art before moving in 1864 to northern Wales to paint in the footsteps of his idol, David Cox. Collier moved to London around 1870, when was elected to the New Water-Colour Society. He was not a prolific exhibitor, but collectors and critics then and today consider him one of the masters of the English landscape watercolor; he was made a Chevalier of the Legion of Honor in acclaim of a painting he sent to the Paris International Exhibition of 1878. Hardworking, shy and often in poor health, yet enabled by a family stipend to work without concern for popular tastes and travel to observe the English countryside (especially in Suffolk), in 1879 Collier built a large house and studio in Hampstead (Longdon) where he spent the rest of his life tirelessly perfecting his studio craft and receiving artist visitors. |
|||||||
A more impressionistic painter in the landscape tradition was John William Inchbold (1830-1888), who received some instruction in drawing in his native Leeds before moving to London to study color lithography with Louis Haghe; he entered the Royal Academy schools in 1847, and exhibited watercolors at the Society of British Artists. In the 1850's he was an oil painter associated with the Pre-Raphaelites and mentored by John Ruskin, with a style that resembles J.M.W. Turner's atmospheric paintings of the 1820's. But he began to develop a more personal landscape style during several excursions to Italy and the Alps, possibly following Ruskin's affection for those mountains. |
|||||||
Another superb talent who extended the watercolor traditions with a personal style is Edward Lear (1812-1888), much more famous for his limericks and nonsense poems but now gaining wider appreciation for his watercolors. The youngest of 21 (!) children, Lear drew colored pictures of birds "for bread and cheese" as a youth, and at age 19 landed an appointment as draftsman at the Zoological Gardens in London. He illustrated several ambitious books and print series on birds, then extended his drawing experience (and aristocratic acquaintances) while employed at the menagerie of the Earl of Derby at Knowlsey, Lancashire; at that time he gave drawing lessons to Queen Victoria. |
|||||||
Toward the end of the century several Victorian painters began searching out new effects in brush technique and in particular new color harmonies. John William North (1842-1924) studied at the Marlborough House School of Art and worked as a wood engraver in the shop of Josiah Whymper, where he met Fred Walker. From 1862-66 North worked as a magazine illustrator, but moved to Somerset (in Wessex) where he lived and worked for most of the rest of his life. He was elected to the OWCS in 1871 and to the Royal Academy in 1893. The Old Pear Tree (1892, 73x96cm) |
|||||||
Toward the end of the 19th century an indigenous school of Scottish painters began to coalesce, leading to the formation of the Scottish Society of Painters in Water-Colour in 1878 (made Royal in 1888). One of the leaders in the "Glasgow School" of painters, though with a style that few other painters imitated, was Arthur Melville (1855-1904). Based in Edinburgh, he studied at the Academie Julien in Paris in 1878 and worked in the artist colony in Barbizon (France). During 1880-82 he travelled to the Middle East and Egypt, and visited Algiers later in life. In 1885 he visited Orkney Island with fellow Scots artist James Guthrie, and there adopted a much darker palette. Widely active, he was elected to the RWS in 1888 and moved to London the following year. Kirkwall, Orkney (1885, 37x51cm) is a good example of the dusky brown palette that Melville preferred in later life, partly under the influence of James McNeill Whistler. Besides these artists there were dozens of others, each with a distinctive twist to their style: the fey bug eyed children of Kate Greenaway (1846-1901), the anthropologically scrupulous paintings of Surrey cottages by a disciple of Birket Foster, Helen Allingham (1848-1926), the whimsical and still beloved book illustrations of Arthur Rackham (1867-1939) and Beatrix Potter (1866-1943), the hallucinatory fairy stories of the brothers Charles Altamont Doyle (1832-1893) and Richard Doyle (1824-1883), the orotund historical platitudes of George John Pinwell (1842-1875) and Sir John Gilbert (1817-1897), the sentimental landscapes of Albert Goodwin (1845-1932), the scrupulous landscape photorealism of Edward John Poynter (1836-1919), Wilmot Pilsbury (1840-1908) and William Fraser Garden (1856-1921); the list is much larger than this. The Victorian era was a time when representationalism was the dominant style; but within that style elements of the industrial present or chivalrous past, fact or fairyland, sentimentality or austerity, technical perfection or spontaneous roughness, figure or landscape, and colors brilliant or subdued all vied in many different combinations to achieve the goals of market superiority or esthetic truth, depending on the aspirations of the individual artist. See also The Pre-Raphaelites.
It's impossible in a brief selection to convey the variety and novelty of Victorian watercolors. The best landscape overview I have seen is the exhibition catalog Victorian Landscape Watercolors by Scott Wilcox and Christopher Newall (Yale Center for British Art, 1992). A wider selection of genres and less well known artists is available in Victorian Watercolors by Christopher Newall (Phaidon, 1994). Both of these books are still in print. There is a limited but carefully chosen selection available in The Great Age of British Watercolors by Andrew Wilton and Anne Lyles (Prestel, 1993). Once you have identified artists who interest you, then Martin Hardie's Water-Colour Painting in Britain: III. The Victorian Period (Batsford, 1968) contains the best overall coverage of each painter's career and works, though Hardie's personal tastes clearly emerge in the amount of space devoted to each painter. |
|||||||